Dr. Robert Gallo Confesses That They Were Forced to Create HIV Virus To Wipe Off African Race
A site run by a friendly and reasonably honest woman I know
recently reposted a text titled “The Man Who Created AIDS: Robert
Gallo.” The text went super-viral, over 80,000 shares on Facebook alone.
Once I read it, I was aghast at how much misinformation and how many
scientifically illiterate statements were in the text and attached
video. I wrote her explaining my reasoning, and she immediately agreed
to take down the text. It still exists on other, less responsible,
sites.
Unfortunately, a large part of the damage has already been done,
and that among other articles has helped foster the continued existence
of a completely unfounded theory based primarily on not understanding
what a patent is in molecular biology. A patent on Ebola or HIV is not
the same as a patent on an engine.
Whereas the engine’s patent is reserving the production of that
type of engine to the patent holder, a patent on HIV or Ebola is a
patent meant to specify how the virus was isolated, how the genotype was
determined, and what this consensus genotype is.
In biology, you can patent things you found to concretely identify
that component, potentially for use in a more complex system later. Keep
in mind that you can even patent seeds obtained from cross-pollination:
the patent does not mean the species was genetically modified in a
laboratory.
The same way a patent on cross-bred species does not mean it was
created in a lab, a patent on a virus genome does NOT mean it was
created in a lab. Robert Gallo first published his isolation and
identification of HIV in 1984, and patented this in 1985. After older
blood samples were then analysed in a search for this virus, it was then
found in the past: it didn’t suddenly occur in the 1970s or 1980s.
Despite the claims of the article whose damage I am working to
undo, the earliest samples of HIV positive blood did not originate from
New York homosexuals from the 1970s, but instead date back to 1920s
Congo.
The virus most certainly did not originate from biological weapons
programs, which are only today becoming advanced enough that creating
such a virus is even theoretically possible. They were most certainly
not advanced enough in 1920, or even 1960, to create a synthetic
retrovirus, which I might add, has still never actually been
accomplished. One of the articles I saw blaming Gallo comically claims
that chimps were supposedly deliberately infected and released in 1979,
which somehow led to the virus occurring in New York in 1971.
The viral “Gallo did it” article that I convinced my friend to take
down had an embedded video, where a man “explains” over dramatic music
that HIV was created through “combining lymphoma, leukemia, and
carcinoma viruses.” I literally burst out laughing, because none of what
he listed was a retrovirus or even a virus, and cancer has literally
nothing to do with HIV.
You could spend your entire life combining lymphomas, carcinomas,
and leukemia, and you would still never end up with a retrovirus at the
end.
All of these theories make very specific claims, without any
evidence. They encourage me to believe that a man (who thinks cancers
are viruses) has special knowledge and access to untold classified
documents. To prove his point, the video displays extremely blurry
documents that are barely legible beyond seeing Gallo’s name.
For all we know, these documents are completely fake, or actually
completely harmless. We don’t know, because as is the norm in such
articles or videos: no sources are supplied. Yes, the United States did
and maybe still does have biological weapons programs. The Soviets did,
and Russia still runs its “Vector” high-security lab, as well.
This is absolutely no indication that HIV is a bioweapon,
especially considering the actual time-line of infections. There are
even more reasons why Ebola is certainly not a bioweapon, but that is
beyond the scope of this text.
Gallo was a scientist, and a researcher, and his position in the
public eye is yet another reason to doubt him being an evil mastermind.
There is no historical evidence actually implicating Gallo, or any
others, in creating a HIV virus.
All of the historical and scientific evidence, as well as a general
understanding of patents in science, point to a legitimate researcher,
along with his peers, simply trying to identify understand a human
illness. There may very well be one or more synthetic doomsday viruses
sitting snugly or being worked on in undisclosed locations (or in BSL-4
labs), but HIV and Ebola are not examples of this.
0 comments:
Post a Comment